Finnish vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,783,818 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.936. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.349% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 349.0 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,461 compared to $32,345, a difference of 34.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $71,697, a difference of 32.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $75,945, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $59,383, a difference of 0.25%), householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $44,003, a difference of 17.8%), and median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $31,489, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 63.6%), single male poverty (13.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 61.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 11.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 17.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 137.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 133.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 131.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 48.8%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.1%), family households (63.5% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.7%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.1%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.3%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.45%), female disability (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.9%).