Romanian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Arapaho
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Arapaho

Excellent
Fair
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Arapaho Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,325,314 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.868. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.966% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 966.1 Arapaho.
Romanian Integration in Arapaho Communities

Romanian vs Arapaho Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $32,345, a difference of 49.8%), median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $41,758, a difference of 43.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $71,697, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $59,383, a difference of 8.0%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $44,003, a difference of 21.9%).
Romanian vs Arapaho Income
Income MetricRomanianArapaho
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Tragic
$32,345
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Tragic
$82,064
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Tragic
$67,965
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Tragic
$36,586
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Tragic
$41,758
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Tragic
$31,489
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Tragic
$44,003
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Tragic
$71,697
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Tragic
$75,945
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Poor
$59,383
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
23.5%

Romanian vs Arapaho Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 75.7%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 55.1%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 20.1%).
Romanian vs Arapaho Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianArapaho
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
16.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
25.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
20.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
20.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
26.4%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
24.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
33.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.1%

Romanian vs Arapaho Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 165.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 141.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 134.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.1%).
Romanian vs Arapaho Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianArapaho
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
25.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
10.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
19.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.2%

Romanian vs Arapaho Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.1%).
Romanian vs Arapaho Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianArapaho
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Excellent
37.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
77.1%

Romanian vs Arapaho Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 63.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.64, a difference of 14.3%).
Romanian vs Arapaho Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianArapaho
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
25.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.64
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
40.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
47.1%

Romanian vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 51.0%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 48.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 37.0%).
Romanian vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianArapaho
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
60.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
26.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
9.4%

Romanian vs Arapaho Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 83.7%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 80.4%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 71.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.080%).
Romanian vs Arapaho Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianArapaho
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
82.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
36.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
26.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
10.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.2%

Romanian vs Arapaho Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 42.1%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.20%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.0%).
Romanian vs Arapaho Disability
Disability MetricRomanianArapaho
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
28.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%