Luxembourger vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,384,219 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.773% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 1,773.5 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $32,345, a difference of 41.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $75,945, a difference of 36.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $71,697, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $59,383, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $44,003, a difference of 14.5%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 75.2%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 69.3%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 17.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 187.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 166.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 146.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 60.1%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 30.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.2%), no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 37.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 66.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 60.6%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 42.3%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.7%).