Pima vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,204,615 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.855. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.932% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 931.9 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $59,383, a difference of 17.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $44,003, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $71,697, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($42,357 compared to $41,758, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $75,945, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($38,285 compared to $36,586, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 87.9%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 73.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (20.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 41.6%), male unemployment (8.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and female unemployment (9.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.9%), married-couple households (35.6% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.82%), average family size (3.75 compared to 3.64, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 92.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 7.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (30.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 21.5%), college, 1 year or more (45.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and college, under 1 year (51.4% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.36%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 37.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.3%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.7%), male disability (12.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.1%).