Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Arapaho
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Arapaho

Excellent
Fair
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Arapaho Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,682,941 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 73.5 Arapaho.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Arapaho Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $32,345, a difference of 60.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $71,697, a difference of 49.1%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $41,758, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $59,383, a difference of 11.8%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $44,003, a difference of 23.5%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaArapaho
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Tragic
$32,345
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Tragic
$82,064
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Tragic
$67,965
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Tragic
$36,586
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Tragic
$41,758
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Tragic
$31,489
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Tragic
$44,003
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Tragic
$71,697
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Tragic
$75,945
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Poor
$59,383
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
23.5%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 81.5%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 65.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 22.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaArapaho
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
16.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
25.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
20.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
26.4%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Tragic
24.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
33.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 170.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 143.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 132.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaArapaho
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.8%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Tragic
25.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
10.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
16.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
9.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaArapaho
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Excellent
37.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
77.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 65.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (63.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 14.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaArapaho
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Tragic
25.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.64
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
40.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
47.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 61.8%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 60.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 43.1%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaArapaho
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
60.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
26.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
9.4%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 102.5%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 102.4%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 85.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.070%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaArapaho
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
82.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Tragic
36.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
26.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
10.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 51.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 33.8%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.8%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Arapaho Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaArapaho
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
28.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%