Crow vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
Crow
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Crow
Arapaho
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in Crow Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,784,125 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 14.4 Arapaho.
Crow vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 23.1%), householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $59,383, a difference of 20.6%), and median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $31,489, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $71,697, a difference of 0.50%), median male earnings ($42,434 compared to $41,758, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($31,729 compared to $32,345, a difference of 1.9%).
Income Metric | Crow | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $31,729 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,605 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,681 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,707 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,434 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,266 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,012 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,337 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $74,257 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,234 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 23.5% |
Crow vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 45.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 34.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.1%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 15.5%).
Poverty Metric | Crow | Arapaho |
Poverty | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.3% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 32.4% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
Crow vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 220.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 198.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and male unemployment (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Crow | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Crow vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Crow | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.8% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.3% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.6% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 75.9% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 76.5% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.3% | Tragic 77.1% |
Crow vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.1%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (40.4% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 0.43%), married-couple households (41.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (65.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Crow | Arapaho |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.82 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.4% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.4% | Tragic 47.1% |
Crow vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 50.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Crow | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.7% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Crow vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.6%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.17%), college, under 1 year (60.2% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Crow | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 99.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 99.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 99.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 99.4% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 99.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.2% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.2% |
Crow vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.54%).
Disability Metric | Crow | Arapaho |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.9% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.6% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |