Immigrants from Oceania vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,845,406 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 115.2 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $32,345, a difference of 39.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $75,945, a difference of 36.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $71,697, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $59,383, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $44,003, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 76.8%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 55.3%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 154.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 141.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 137.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 54.1%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.64, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 63.6%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 58.9%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.15%), high school diploma (88.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 32.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.1%).