Choctaw vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,327,218 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 13.6 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 19.9%), median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $41,758, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $59,383, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($69,947 compared to $67,965, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $44,003, a difference of 3.3%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $82,064, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 29.2%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 105.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 99.5%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 96.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 27.7%), currently married (46.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.64, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.97%), family households (64.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.9%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 45.9%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 8.9%).