Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Installation, Maintenance & Repair
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Drowning Creek 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#5
2. Homestead 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#13
3. Ratliff City 84.3% 4.2% (+80.1)#3 3.1% (+81.2)#21
4. Panola 72.7% 4.2% (+68.6)#4 3.1% (+69.7)#28
5. Gowen 66.7% 4.2% (+62.5)#5 3.1% (+63.6)#33
6. Snake Creek 46.9% 4.2% (+42.8)#6 3.1% (+43.9)#96
7. Bison 44.4% 4.2% (+40.3)#7 3.1% (+41.4)#109
8. Macomb 42.9% 4.2% (+38.7)#8 3.1% (+39.8)#123
9. Old Eucha 42.9% 4.2% (+38.7)#9 3.1% (+39.8)#124
10. Watova 42.3% 4.2% (+38.1)#10 3.1% (+39.2)#127
11. Manitou 42.2% 4.2% (+38.0)#11 3.1% (+39.1)#128
12. May 37.5% 4.2% (+33.3)#12 3.1% (+34.4)#177
13. Lawtonka Acres 36.8% 4.2% (+32.7)#13 3.1% (+33.8)#180
14. Bryant 35.7% 4.2% (+31.5)#14 3.1% (+32.6)#186
15. Rose 33.3% 4.2% (+29.2)#15 3.1% (+30.3)#218
16. Hitchcock 33.3% 4.2% (+29.2)#16 3.1% (+30.3)#231
17. Byron 28.6% 4.2% (+24.4)#17 3.1% (+25.5)#321
18. Monroe 27.3% 4.2% (+23.1)#18 3.1% (+24.2)#349
19. Loco 27.3% 4.2% (+23.1)#19 3.1% (+24.2)#351
20. Murphy 25.5% 4.2% (+21.4)#20 3.1% (+22.5)#390
21. Dennis 25.3% 4.2% (+21.1)#21 3.1% (+22.2)#399
22. Nash 24.4% 4.2% (+20.2)#22 3.1% (+21.3)#446
23. Little Rock 23.8% 4.2% (+19.6)#23 3.1% (+20.7)#467
24. Bug Tussle 23.6% 4.2% (+19.4)#24 3.1% (+20.5)#476
25. Manchester 23.3% 4.2% (+19.1)#25 3.1% (+20.2)#485
26. Orlando 23.1% 4.2% (+18.9)#26 3.1% (+20.0)#494
27. Zena 22.5% 4.2% (+18.3)#27 3.1% (+19.4)#522
28. Ashland 21.1% 4.2% (+16.9)#28 3.1% (+18.0)#601
29. Ninnekah 20.4% 4.2% (+16.2)#29 3.1% (+17.4)#639
30. Optima 20.3% 4.2% (+16.2)#30 3.1% (+17.3)#649
31. Lake Ellsworth Addition 20.3% 4.2% (+16.1)#31 3.1% (+17.2)#659
32. Fittstown 20.0% 4.2% (+15.8)#32 3.1% (+16.9)#682
33. Cyril 18.6% 4.2% (+14.4)#33 3.1% (+15.5)#760
34. Calumet 18.5% 4.2% (+14.3)#34 3.1% (+15.5)#766
35. Cloud Creek 18.5% 4.2% (+14.3)#35 3.1% (+15.5)#769
36. Dill City 17.7% 4.2% (+13.6)#36 3.1% (+14.7)#844
37. Sams Corner 17.0% 4.2% (+12.9)#37 3.1% (+14.0)#901
38. Baron 17.0% 4.2% (+12.8)#38 3.1% (+13.9)#904
39. Ralston 16.8% 4.2% (+12.6)#39 3.1% (+13.7)#924
40. Hickory 16.7% 4.2% (+12.5)#40 3.1% (+13.6)#938
41. Peoria 16.7% 4.2% (+12.5)#41 3.1% (+13.6)#943
42. Dwight Mission 16.7% 4.2% (+12.5)#42 3.1% (+13.6)#951
43. Friendship 16.7% 4.2% (+12.5)#44 3.1% (+13.6)#955
44. Avard 16.7% 4.2% (+12.5)#45 3.1% (+13.6)#956
45. Fort Supply 16.2% 4.2% (+12.0)#46 3.1% (+13.1)#994
46. Blackburn 16.1% 4.2% (+12.0)#47 3.1% (+13.1)#1,010
47. Tyrone 15.8% 4.2% (+11.7)#48 3.1% (+12.8)#1,036
48. Wauhillau 15.4% 4.2% (+11.2)#49 3.1% (+12.3)#1,077
49. Teresita 15.4% 4.2% (+11.2)#50 3.1% (+12.3)#1,086
50. Hough 15.4% 4.2% (+11.2)#51 3.1% (+12.3)#1,093
51. Crescent Springs 15.2% 4.2% (+11.0)#52 3.1% (+12.1)#1,116
52. Gage 15.1% 4.2% (+11.0)#53 3.1% (+12.1)#1,133
53. Elmer 15.0% 4.2% (+10.8)#54 3.1% (+11.9)#1,163
54. Tribbey 14.7% 4.2% (+10.6)#55 3.1% (+11.7)#1,199
55. Mallard Bay 14.3% 4.2% (+10.1)#56 3.1% (+11.2)#1,265
56. Enterprise 14.3% 4.2% (+10.1)#57 3.1% (+11.2)#1,275
57. Empire City 14.1% 4.2% (+9.95)#58 3.1% (+11.1)#1,307
58. Turpin 13.9% 4.2% (+9.70)#59 3.1% (+10.8)#1,369
59. Adams 13.8% 4.2% (+9.66)#60 3.1% (+10.8)#1,374
60. Spaulding 13.7% 4.2% (+9.56)#61 3.1% (+10.7)#1,391
61. Big Cabin 13.6% 4.2% (+9.41)#62 3.1% (+10.5)#1,418
62. Pink 13.4% 4.2% (+9.21)#63 3.1% (+10.3)#1,471
63. Sequoyah 13.1% 4.2% (+8.90)#64 3.1% (+10.0)#1,547
64. Long 12.8% 4.2% (+8.65)#65 3.1% (+9.75)#1,620
65. Caney 12.2% 4.2% (+8.07)#66 3.1% (+9.17)#1,770
66. Middleberg 12.1% 4.2% (+7.95)#67 3.1% (+9.05)#1,793
67. New Cordell 12.1% 4.2% (+7.95)#68 3.1% (+9.05)#1,795
68. Canute 12.1% 4.2% (+7.90)#69 3.1% (+9.00)#1,804
69. New Eucha 12.0% 4.2% (+7.87)#70 3.1% (+8.97)#1,814
70. Fox 12.0% 4.2% (+7.83)#71 3.1% (+8.93)#1,834
71. Talala 11.9% 4.2% (+7.77)#72 3.1% (+8.87)#1,846
72. Headrick 11.8% 4.2% (+7.60)#73 3.1% (+8.70)#1,898
73. Comanche 11.7% 4.2% (+7.52)#74 3.1% (+8.62)#1,921
74. Hanson 11.5% 4.2% (+7.37)#75 3.1% (+8.47)#1,968
75. Osage 11.4% 4.2% (+7.26)#76 3.1% (+8.36)#2,013
76. Randlett 11.2% 4.2% (+7.00)#77 3.1% (+8.11)#2,083
77. Shidler 11.1% 4.2% (+6.94)#78 3.1% (+8.04)#2,099
78. Garvin 11.1% 4.2% (+6.94)#79 3.1% (+8.04)#2,108
79. Valley Park 11.1% 4.2% (+6.94)#80 3.1% (+8.04)#2,124
80. Mill Creek 10.9% 4.2% (+6.72)#81 3.1% (+7.82)#2,178
81. Dotyville 10.8% 4.2% (+6.60)#82 3.1% (+7.70)#2,225
82. Olustee 10.7% 4.2% (+6.58)#83 3.1% (+7.68)#2,229
83. Tipton 10.7% 4.2% (+6.57)#84 3.1% (+7.67)#2,234
84. Temple 10.7% 4.2% (+6.50)#85 3.1% (+7.60)#2,260
85. Sweetwater 10.6% 4.2% (+6.44)#86 3.1% (+7.54)#2,286
86. Burns Flat 10.6% 4.2% (+6.42)#87 3.1% (+7.52)#2,297
87. Moffett 10.5% 4.2% (+6.36)#88 3.1% (+7.46)#2,325
88. Brooksville 10.5% 4.2% (+6.36)#89 3.1% (+7.46)#2,327
89. Cameron 10.5% 4.2% (+6.31)#90 3.1% (+7.42)#2,341
90. Roff 10.4% 4.2% (+6.27)#91 3.1% (+7.37)#2,355
91. Zeb 10.3% 4.2% (+6.11)#92 3.1% (+7.21)#2,430
92. Cleo Springs 10.3% 4.2% (+6.09)#93 3.1% (+7.19)#2,439
93. Bell 10.2% 4.2% (+6.03)#94 3.1% (+7.14)#2,467
94. Millerton 10.1% 4.2% (+5.94)#95 3.1% (+7.04)#2,505
95. Pettit 10.0% 4.2% (+5.88)#96 3.1% (+6.98)#2,526
96. Council Hill 10.0% 4.2% (+5.83)#97 3.1% (+6.93)#2,563
97. Sasakwa 10.0% 4.2% (+5.83)#98 3.1% (+6.93)#2,564
98. Cookson 9.9% 4.2% (+5.75)#99 3.1% (+6.86)#2,599
99. Meno 9.8% 4.2% (+5.62)#100 3.1% (+6.72)#2,682
100. Carter 9.8% 4.2% (+5.59)#101 3.1% (+6.69)#2,696

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
84.3%
#3
72.7%
#4
66.7%
#5
46.9%
#6
44.4%
#7
42.9%
#8
42.9%
#9
42.2%
#10
37.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Oklahoma?
Drowning Creek has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Oklahoma is 4.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States is 3.1%.