Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Installation, Maintenance & Repair
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Raleigh 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#18
2. Nash 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#2 3.1% (+96.9)#19
3. Ross 49.0% 4.2% (+44.8)#3 3.1% (+46.0)#85
4. Calio 33.3% 4.2% (+29.1)#4 3.1% (+30.3)#233
5. Deering 32.7% 4.2% (+28.4)#5 3.1% (+29.6)#243
6. Souris 31.0% 4.2% (+26.8)#6 3.1% (+28.0)#266
7. Plaza 25.3% 4.2% (+21.0)#7 3.1% (+22.2)#403
8. Erie 25.0% 4.2% (+20.8)#8 3.1% (+21.9)#424
9. Jud 23.8% 4.2% (+19.6)#9 3.1% (+20.7)#469
10. Porcupine 22.2% 4.2% (+18.0)#10 3.1% (+19.2)#529
11. Aneta 22.1% 4.2% (+17.8)#11 3.1% (+19.0)#540
12. Kathryn 21.7% 4.2% (+17.5)#12 3.1% (+18.7)#558
13. Berlin 21.4% 4.2% (+17.2)#13 3.1% (+18.4)#578
14. Dodge 18.8% 4.2% (+14.5)#14 3.1% (+15.7)#748
15. Inkster 18.8% 4.2% (+14.5)#15 3.1% (+15.7)#754
16. Nome 18.5% 4.2% (+14.3)#16 3.1% (+15.5)#771
17. Hampden 18.2% 4.2% (+14.0)#17 3.1% (+15.1)#805
18. Perth 17.6% 4.2% (+13.4)#18 3.1% (+14.6)#853
19. Foxholm 17.2% 4.2% (+13.0)#19 3.1% (+14.2)#880
20. Riverdale 16.7% 4.2% (+12.4)#20 3.1% (+13.6)#937
21. Fredonia 16.7% 4.2% (+12.4)#21 3.1% (+13.6)#952
22. Galesburg 16.3% 4.2% (+12.1)#22 3.1% (+13.2)#988
23. Hannaford 15.7% 4.2% (+11.5)#23 3.1% (+12.6)#1,054
24. Mercer 15.6% 4.2% (+11.4)#24 3.1% (+12.6)#1,058
25. Wing 15.5% 4.2% (+11.3)#25 3.1% (+12.4)#1,069
26. Menoken 14.7% 4.2% (+10.5)#26 3.1% (+11.6)#1,202
27. Gardner 14.6% 4.2% (+10.4)#27 3.1% (+11.6)#1,214
28. Manvel 14.6% 4.2% (+10.3)#28 3.1% (+11.5)#1,225
29. Lidgerwood 14.5% 4.2% (+10.2)#29 3.1% (+11.4)#1,239
30. Apple Valley 14.3% 4.2% (+10.1)#30 3.1% (+11.2)#1,267
31. Dahlen 14.3% 4.2% (+10.1)#31 3.1% (+11.2)#1,283
32. Ashley 14.0% 4.2% (+9.82)#32 3.1% (+11.0)#1,325
33. Napoleon 14.0% 4.2% (+9.77)#33 3.1% (+10.9)#1,336
34. Pick City 14.0% 4.2% (+9.73)#34 3.1% (+10.9)#1,343
35. Elliott 13.6% 4.2% (+9.42)#35 3.1% (+10.6)#1,410
36. Halliday 13.5% 4.2% (+9.26)#36 3.1% (+10.4)#1,441
37. Forbes 13.3% 4.2% (+9.11)#37 3.1% (+10.3)#1,493
38. Stanton 13.2% 4.2% (+8.96)#38 3.1% (+10.1)#1,519
39. Noonan 12.9% 4.2% (+8.68)#39 3.1% (+9.84)#1,595
40. Underwood 12.8% 4.2% (+8.60)#40 3.1% (+9.75)#1,619
41. Mooreton 12.8% 4.2% (+8.60)#41 3.1% (+9.75)#1,623
42. Upham 12.1% 4.2% (+7.90)#42 3.1% (+9.05)#1,792
43. Adams 11.9% 4.2% (+7.68)#43 3.1% (+8.84)#1,857
44. Anamoose 11.8% 4.2% (+7.54)#44 3.1% (+8.70)#1,892
45. Flaxton 11.8% 4.2% (+7.54)#45 3.1% (+8.70)#1,903
46. Niagara 11.8% 4.2% (+7.54)#46 3.1% (+8.70)#1,906
47. Page 11.4% 4.2% (+7.21)#47 3.1% (+8.36)#2,009
48. Abercrombie 11.1% 4.2% (+6.89)#48 3.1% (+8.04)#2,103
49. Fort Yates 11.1% 4.2% (+6.89)#49 3.1% (+8.04)#2,109
50. Max 10.8% 4.2% (+6.62)#50 3.1% (+7.78)#2,199
51. Fort Totten 10.5% 4.2% (+6.31)#51 3.1% (+7.46)#2,310
52. Belfield 10.5% 4.2% (+6.31)#52 3.1% (+7.46)#2,312
53. Gladstone 10.3% 4.2% (+6.05)#53 3.1% (+7.21)#2,434
54. Glen Ullin 9.9% 4.2% (+5.70)#54 3.1% (+6.86)#2,600
55. Harmon 9.9% 4.2% (+5.69)#55 3.1% (+6.84)#2,606
56. Taylor 9.9% 4.2% (+5.67)#56 3.1% (+6.82)#2,617
57. Binford 9.9% 4.2% (+5.64)#57 3.1% (+6.79)#2,640
58. Casselton 9.8% 4.2% (+5.60)#58 3.1% (+6.75)#2,660
59. Minot Afb 9.8% 4.2% (+5.58)#59 3.1% (+6.73)#2,674
60. Williston 9.7% 4.2% (+5.50)#60 3.1% (+6.65)#2,719
61. Arnegard 9.4% 4.2% (+5.19)#61 3.1% (+6.34)#2,890
62. Bowman 9.1% 4.2% (+4.84)#62 3.1% (+5.99)#3,088
63. Leeds 9.0% 4.2% (+4.79)#63 3.1% (+5.95)#3,114
64. Pettibone 8.7% 4.2% (+4.48)#64 3.1% (+5.63)#3,365
65. Karlsruhe 8.7% 4.2% (+4.48)#65 3.1% (+5.63)#3,366
66. Fullerton 8.6% 4.2% (+4.35)#66 3.1% (+5.50)#3,452
67. Ellendale 8.5% 4.2% (+4.29)#67 3.1% (+5.44)#3,486
68. Fort Ransom 8.5% 4.2% (+4.29)#68 3.1% (+5.44)#3,496
69. Beulah 8.5% 4.2% (+4.26)#69 3.1% (+5.41)#3,523
70. Mohall 8.3% 4.2% (+4.08)#70 3.1% (+5.23)#3,677
71. Bathgate 8.0% 4.2% (+3.78)#71 3.1% (+4.93)#3,944
72. Carrington 7.9% 4.2% (+3.69)#72 3.1% (+4.85)#4,009
73. Hankinson 7.9% 4.2% (+3.68)#73 3.1% (+4.84)#4,017
74. Cleveland 7.8% 4.2% (+3.55)#74 3.1% (+4.70)#4,135
75. Sanborn 7.7% 4.2% (+3.47)#75 3.1% (+4.62)#4,211
76. Coleharbor 7.7% 4.2% (+3.47)#76 3.1% (+4.62)#4,221
77. Litchville 7.5% 4.2% (+3.33)#77 3.1% (+4.48)#4,377
78. Pembina 7.5% 4.2% (+3.32)#78 3.1% (+4.47)#4,383
79. Fairmount 7.5% 4.2% (+3.31)#79 3.1% (+4.47)#4,391
80. Pingree 7.5% 4.2% (+3.28)#80 3.1% (+4.43)#4,440
81. Langdon 7.5% 4.2% (+3.25)#81 3.1% (+4.40)#4,467
82. Surrey 7.4% 4.2% (+3.19)#82 3.1% (+4.34)#4,514
83. Hazelton 7.4% 4.2% (+3.19)#83 3.1% (+4.34)#4,522
84. Rolette 7.3% 4.2% (+3.12)#84 3.1% (+4.28)#4,586
85. Ruthville 7.2% 4.2% (+3.03)#85 3.1% (+4.18)#4,720
86. Mcclusky 7.2% 4.2% (+3.01)#86 3.1% (+4.16)#4,737
87. Reynolds 7.1% 4.2% (+2.89)#87 3.1% (+4.05)#4,875
88. Stanley 7.0% 4.2% (+2.76)#88 3.1% (+3.91)#5,025
89. Buchanan 6.9% 4.2% (+2.72)#89 3.1% (+3.88)#5,058
90. Northwood 6.9% 4.2% (+2.68)#90 3.1% (+3.83)#5,102
91. Killdeer 6.9% 4.2% (+2.65)#91 3.1% (+3.80)#5,143
92. Glenburn 6.8% 4.2% (+2.58)#92 3.1% (+3.73)#5,267
93. Forman 6.7% 4.2% (+2.51)#93 3.1% (+3.67)#5,341
94. Finley 6.7% 4.2% (+2.49)#94 3.1% (+3.64)#5,377
95. Clifford 6.7% 4.2% (+2.45)#95 3.1% (+3.60)#5,458
96. Grace City 6.7% 4.2% (+2.45)#96 3.1% (+3.60)#5,461
97. New England 6.6% 4.2% (+2.43)#97 3.1% (+3.58)#5,477
98. Center 6.6% 4.2% (+2.41)#98 3.1% (+3.56)#5,508
99. Lisbon 6.6% 4.2% (+2.35)#99 3.1% (+3.50)#5,597
100. Cooperstown 6.6% 4.2% (+2.33)#100 3.1% (+3.49)#5,617

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
49.0%
#4
33.3%
#5
32.7%
#6
31.0%
#7
25.3%
#8
25.0%
#9
23.8%
#10
22.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota?
Raleigh has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota is 4.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States is 3.1%.