Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Installation, Maintenance & Repair
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Raleigh100.0%4.2%(+95.8)#13.1%(+96.9)#18
2.Nash100.0%4.2%(+95.8)#23.1%(+96.9)#19
3.Ross49.0%4.2%(+44.8)#33.1%(+46.0)#85
4.Calio33.3%4.2%(+29.1)#43.1%(+30.3)#233
5.Deering32.7%4.2%(+28.4)#53.1%(+29.6)#243
6.Souris31.0%4.2%(+26.8)#63.1%(+28.0)#266
7.Plaza25.3%4.2%(+21.0)#73.1%(+22.2)#403
8.Erie25.0%4.2%(+20.8)#83.1%(+21.9)#424
9.Jud23.8%4.2%(+19.6)#93.1%(+20.7)#469
10.Porcupine22.2%4.2%(+18.0)#103.1%(+19.2)#529
11.Aneta22.1%4.2%(+17.8)#113.1%(+19.0)#540
12.Kathryn21.7%4.2%(+17.5)#123.1%(+18.7)#558
13.Berlin21.4%4.2%(+17.2)#133.1%(+18.4)#578
14.Dodge18.8%4.2%(+14.5)#143.1%(+15.7)#748
15.Inkster18.8%4.2%(+14.5)#153.1%(+15.7)#754
16.Nome18.5%4.2%(+14.3)#163.1%(+15.5)#771
17.Hampden18.2%4.2%(+14.0)#173.1%(+15.1)#805
18.Perth17.6%4.2%(+13.4)#183.1%(+14.6)#853
19.Foxholm17.2%4.2%(+13.0)#193.1%(+14.2)#880
20.Riverdale16.7%4.2%(+12.4)#203.1%(+13.6)#937
21.Fredonia16.7%4.2%(+12.4)#213.1%(+13.6)#952
22.Galesburg16.3%4.2%(+12.1)#223.1%(+13.2)#988
23.Hannaford15.7%4.2%(+11.5)#233.1%(+12.6)#1,054
24.Mercer15.6%4.2%(+11.4)#243.1%(+12.6)#1,058
25.Wing15.5%4.2%(+11.3)#253.1%(+12.4)#1,069
26.Menoken14.7%4.2%(+10.5)#263.1%(+11.6)#1,202
27.Gardner14.6%4.2%(+10.4)#273.1%(+11.6)#1,214
28.Manvel14.6%4.2%(+10.3)#283.1%(+11.5)#1,225
29.Lidgerwood14.5%4.2%(+10.2)#293.1%(+11.4)#1,239
30.Apple Valley14.3%4.2%(+10.1)#303.1%(+11.2)#1,267
31.Dahlen14.3%4.2%(+10.1)#313.1%(+11.2)#1,283
32.Ashley14.0%4.2%(+9.82)#323.1%(+11.0)#1,325
33.Napoleon14.0%4.2%(+9.77)#333.1%(+10.9)#1,336
34.Pick City14.0%4.2%(+9.73)#343.1%(+10.9)#1,343
35.Elliott13.6%4.2%(+9.42)#353.1%(+10.6)#1,410
36.Halliday13.5%4.2%(+9.26)#363.1%(+10.4)#1,441
37.Forbes13.3%4.2%(+9.11)#373.1%(+10.3)#1,493
38.Stanton13.2%4.2%(+8.96)#383.1%(+10.1)#1,519
39.Noonan12.9%4.2%(+8.68)#393.1%(+9.84)#1,595
40.Underwood12.8%4.2%(+8.60)#403.1%(+9.75)#1,619
41.Mooreton12.8%4.2%(+8.60)#413.1%(+9.75)#1,623
42.Upham12.1%4.2%(+7.90)#423.1%(+9.05)#1,792
43.Adams11.9%4.2%(+7.68)#433.1%(+8.84)#1,857
44.Anamoose11.8%4.2%(+7.54)#443.1%(+8.70)#1,892
45.Flaxton11.8%4.2%(+7.54)#453.1%(+8.70)#1,903
46.Niagara11.8%4.2%(+7.54)#463.1%(+8.70)#1,906
47.Page11.4%4.2%(+7.21)#473.1%(+8.36)#2,009
48.Abercrombie11.1%4.2%(+6.89)#483.1%(+8.04)#2,103
49.Fort Yates11.1%4.2%(+6.89)#493.1%(+8.04)#2,109
50.Max10.8%4.2%(+6.62)#503.1%(+7.78)#2,199
51.Fort Totten10.5%4.2%(+6.31)#513.1%(+7.46)#2,310
52.Belfield10.5%4.2%(+6.31)#523.1%(+7.46)#2,312
53.Gladstone10.3%4.2%(+6.05)#533.1%(+7.21)#2,434
54.Glen Ullin9.9%4.2%(+5.70)#543.1%(+6.86)#2,600
55.Harmon9.9%4.2%(+5.69)#553.1%(+6.84)#2,606
56.Taylor9.9%4.2%(+5.67)#563.1%(+6.82)#2,617
57.Binford9.9%4.2%(+5.64)#573.1%(+6.79)#2,640
58.Casselton9.8%4.2%(+5.60)#583.1%(+6.75)#2,660
59.Minot Afb9.8%4.2%(+5.58)#593.1%(+6.73)#2,674
60.Williston9.7%4.2%(+5.50)#603.1%(+6.65)#2,719
61.Arnegard9.4%4.2%(+5.19)#613.1%(+6.34)#2,890
62.Bowman9.1%4.2%(+4.84)#623.1%(+5.99)#3,088
63.Leeds9.0%4.2%(+4.79)#633.1%(+5.95)#3,114
64.Pettibone8.7%4.2%(+4.48)#643.1%(+5.63)#3,365
65.Karlsruhe8.7%4.2%(+4.48)#653.1%(+5.63)#3,366
66.Fullerton8.6%4.2%(+4.35)#663.1%(+5.50)#3,452
67.Ellendale8.5%4.2%(+4.29)#673.1%(+5.44)#3,486
68.Fort Ransom8.5%4.2%(+4.29)#683.1%(+5.44)#3,496
69.Beulah8.5%4.2%(+4.26)#693.1%(+5.41)#3,523
70.Mohall8.3%4.2%(+4.08)#703.1%(+5.23)#3,677
71.Bathgate8.0%4.2%(+3.78)#713.1%(+4.93)#3,944
72.Carrington7.9%4.2%(+3.69)#723.1%(+4.85)#4,009
73.Hankinson7.9%4.2%(+3.68)#733.1%(+4.84)#4,017
74.Cleveland7.8%4.2%(+3.55)#743.1%(+4.70)#4,135
75.Sanborn7.7%4.2%(+3.47)#753.1%(+4.62)#4,211
76.Coleharbor7.7%4.2%(+3.47)#763.1%(+4.62)#4,221
77.Litchville7.5%4.2%(+3.33)#773.1%(+4.48)#4,377
78.Pembina7.5%4.2%(+3.32)#783.1%(+4.47)#4,383
79.Fairmount7.5%4.2%(+3.31)#793.1%(+4.47)#4,391
80.Pingree7.5%4.2%(+3.28)#803.1%(+4.43)#4,440
81.Langdon7.5%4.2%(+3.25)#813.1%(+4.40)#4,467
82.Surrey7.4%4.2%(+3.19)#823.1%(+4.34)#4,514
83.Hazelton7.4%4.2%(+3.19)#833.1%(+4.34)#4,522
84.Rolette7.3%4.2%(+3.12)#843.1%(+4.28)#4,586
85.Ruthville7.2%4.2%(+3.03)#853.1%(+4.18)#4,720
86.Mcclusky7.2%4.2%(+3.01)#863.1%(+4.16)#4,737
87.Reynolds7.1%4.2%(+2.89)#873.1%(+4.05)#4,875
88.Stanley7.0%4.2%(+2.76)#883.1%(+3.91)#5,025
89.Buchanan6.9%4.2%(+2.72)#893.1%(+3.88)#5,058
90.Northwood6.9%4.2%(+2.68)#903.1%(+3.83)#5,102
91.Killdeer6.9%4.2%(+2.65)#913.1%(+3.80)#5,143
92.Glenburn6.8%4.2%(+2.58)#923.1%(+3.73)#5,267
93.Forman6.7%4.2%(+2.51)#933.1%(+3.67)#5,341
94.Finley6.7%4.2%(+2.49)#943.1%(+3.64)#5,377
95.Clifford6.7%4.2%(+2.45)#953.1%(+3.60)#5,458
96.Grace City6.7%4.2%(+2.45)#963.1%(+3.60)#5,461
97.New England6.6%4.2%(+2.43)#973.1%(+3.58)#5,477
98.Center6.6%4.2%(+2.41)#983.1%(+3.56)#5,508
99.Lisbon6.6%4.2%(+2.35)#993.1%(+3.50)#5,597
100.Cooperstown6.6%4.2%(+2.33)#1003.1%(+3.49)#5,617

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
49.0%
#4
33.3%
#5
32.7%
#6
31.0%
#7
25.3%
#8
25.0%
#9
23.8%
#10
22.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota?
Raleigh has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in North Dakota is 4.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States is 3.1%.