Swedish vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,743,775 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.796. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.069% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to a decrease of 68.7 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($57,445 compared to $68,960, a difference of 20.1%), median household income ($88,524 compared to $106,057, a difference of 19.8%), and median earnings ($47,851 compared to $57,114, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.34%), householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $57,818, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $70,103, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 17.9%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.2%), male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and poverty (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.8%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 27.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 20.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (50.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 0.13%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (49.7% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 26.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.8%), master's degree (15.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 35.9%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.8% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 53.7%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.67%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.8%).