Mexican vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 467,166,426 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Mexican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.847. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexicans corresponds to a decrease of 22.4 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,559 compared to $52,660, a difference of 52.4%), median male earnings ($46,147 compared to $68,960, a difference of 49.4%), and median family income ($85,618 compared to $125,956, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 12.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,989 compared to $57,818, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,897 compared to $70,103, a difference of 30.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 66.6%), receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 65.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 11.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.4%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 49.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.9%), family households with children (31.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (47.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 27.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 124.4%), professional degree (2.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 114.6%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 113.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 40.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.0%), disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 18.5%).