Pima vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,146,661 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.922. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 86.8 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $52,660, a difference of 71.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $124,188, a difference of 69.3%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $106,057, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $57,818, a difference of 12.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $46,324, a difference of 31.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $70,103, a difference of 38.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 164.7%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 154.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 135.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 52.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 61.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 186.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 137.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 134.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 112.5%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 108.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.23, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 65.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 124.0%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 108.3%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 99.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 87.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 86.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 82.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 21.4%).