Choctaw vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,932,640 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.170. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 10.0 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $106,057, a difference of 51.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $124,188, a difference of 50.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $116,626, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $57,818, a difference of 27.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $70,103, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 77.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 68.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 37.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 49.4%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.1%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.42%), family households (64.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.84%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 87.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 82.7%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 85.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 84.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 82.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.7%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.9%).