Canadian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 396,885,828 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.331. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.199% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 198.6 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,769 compared to $106,057, a difference of 20.8%), median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $68,960, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $116,626, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $57,818, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $70,103, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 26.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 29.4%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.36%), no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 32.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.0%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.10%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and high school diploma (90.6% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 43.5%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.2%).