Finnish vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,723,203 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to a decrease of 10.3 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,607 compared to $106,057, a difference of 26.9%), median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $68,960, a difference of 26.0%), and median earnings ($45,940 compared to $57,114, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $57,818, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $70,103, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.8%), single male poverty (13.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 27.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 28.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.09 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.3%), and family households (63.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 46.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.7%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 54.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.74%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.3%).