Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Latvia

Immigrants from South Central Asia

Excellent
Exceptional
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,106,861 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.430. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.547% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 547.1 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,602 compared to $106,057, a difference of 13.3%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $68,960, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $57,818, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($50,914 compared to $52,660, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $46,324, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $70,103, a difference of 9.0%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from South Central Asia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,914
Exceptional
$52,660
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,826
Exceptional
$125,956
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,602
Exceptional
$106,057
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,555
Exceptional
$57,114
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,422
Exceptional
$68,960
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,099
Exceptional
$46,324
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,737
Exceptional
$57,818
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,522
Exceptional
$116,626
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,454
Exceptional
$124,188
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,298
Exceptional
$70,103
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
29.3%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 17.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.6%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from South Central Asia
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
17.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
13.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
25.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from South Central Asia
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.73%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from South Central Asia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.8%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Tragic
74.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
84.0%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 17.9%), family households with children (25.9% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from South Central Asia
Family Households
Tragic
62.0%
Exceptional
66.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
30.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
50.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.1%
Exceptional
24.7%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 41.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.2%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from South Central Asia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
91.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.2%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
6.1%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.3%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and 11th grade (93.8% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from South Central Asia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Good
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.1%
Exceptional
72.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.8%
Exceptional
55.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
48.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
20.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.45%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from South Central Asia
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
8.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%