Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from South Central Asia
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,164,376 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.180% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 180.4 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $68,960, a difference of 20.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $116,626, a difference of 19.2%), and median household income ($89,496 compared to $106,057, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $70,103, a difference of 10.2%), per capita income ($47,394 compared to $52,660, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $57,818, a difference of 11.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,394 | Exceptional $52,660 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,830 | Exceptional $125,956 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,496 | Exceptional $106,057 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,913 | Exceptional $57,114 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,352 | Exceptional $68,960 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,527 | Exceptional $46,324 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,914 | Exceptional $57,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,880 | Exceptional $116,626 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,992 | Exceptional $124,188 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,643 | Exceptional $70,103 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Tragic 29.3% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 20.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.88%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 17.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Exceptional 17.8% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 25.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.67%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Tragic 74.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 22.9%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.2%), family households (63.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 30.0% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Exceptional 50.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 91.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Exceptional 56.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Fair 6.1% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.3%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and bachelor's degree (42.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.080%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.9% | Exceptional 72.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Exceptional 55.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.6% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Exceptional 20.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 8.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Exceptional 46.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Good 3.0% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |