Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Norwegians

Fair
Excellent
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Norwegian Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,461,196 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.563% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 563.2 Norwegians.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Norwegian Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 26.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $103,682, a difference of 13.5%), and median family income ($94,472 compared to $106,144, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $38,802, a difference of 2.0%), median earnings ($43,998 compared to $46,865, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $61,104, a difference of 7.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNorwegian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Good
$44,480
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Excellent
$106,144
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Good
$86,084
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Good
$46,865
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Excellent
$55,965
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Poor
$38,802
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Exceptional
$53,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Good
$96,866
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Excellent
$103,682
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Average
$61,104
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
29.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 62.1%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 52.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNorwegian
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
6.9%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
3.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNorwegian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNorwegian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
46.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
84.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.0%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and family households (62.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNorwegian
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.08
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Exceptional
50.2%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Exceptional
29.3%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 61.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.9%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNorwegian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Exceptional
93.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
62.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 133.2%), college, under 1 year (62.5% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and associate's degree (43.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNorwegian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
96.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
96.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
95.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
94.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Exceptional
92.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Norwegian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNorwegian
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%