Uruguayan vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,349,248 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 35.0 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 15.1%), median family income ($100,656 compared to $106,144, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $103,682, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,318 compared to $44,480, a difference of 0.36%), median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $38,802, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $53,127, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 45.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 39.2%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.20%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 34.0%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 32.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.3%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.89%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 75.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 42.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 66.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.3%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.6%).