Arapaho vs Norwegian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Norwegian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Norwegians
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Norwegian Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,652,768 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 37.9 Norwegians.
Arapaho vs Norwegian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $44,480, a difference of 37.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $103,682, a difference of 36.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $96,866, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $61,104, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $53,127, a difference of 20.7%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $38,802, a difference of 23.2%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Norwegian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Good $44,480 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Excellent $106,144 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Good $86,084 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Good $46,865 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Excellent $55,965 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Poor $38,802 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Exceptional $53,127 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Good $96,866 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Excellent $103,682 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Average $61,104 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Tragic 29.0% |
Arapaho vs Norwegian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 83.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 76.7%), and single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 69.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 17.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 21.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.6%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Norwegian |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Arapaho vs Norwegian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 163.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (10.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 157.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 157.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Norwegian |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Arapaho vs Norwegian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Norwegian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Exceptional 46.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 85.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Exceptional 84.4% |
Arapaho vs Norwegian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 60.6%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.1%), and currently married (40.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.1%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.08, a difference of 18.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Norwegian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Poor 63.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Tragic 3.08 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 50.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 29.3% |
Arapaho vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.0%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 10.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Norwegian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 93.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 62.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Arapaho vs Norwegian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.6%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 56.1%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.12%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Norwegian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 96.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 96.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Exceptional 95.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 94.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 92.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Exceptional 68.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 61.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Excellent 47.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Average 37.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Average 1.8% |
Arapaho vs Norwegian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 31.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.0%), female disability (13.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.3%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Norwegian |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Fair 11.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 45.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |