Luxembourger vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,282,945 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $53,127, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $38,802, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,183 compared to $106,144, a difference of 0.040%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $103,682, a difference of 0.14%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $61,104, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and poverty (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.8%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.30%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.08, a difference of 0.69%), and family households (63.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.7%), no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.2% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.9%).