Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Norwegians

Excellent
Excellent
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Norwegian Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,318,461 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.135% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 135.4 Norwegians.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Norwegian Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $44,480, a difference of 16.4%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $38,802, a difference of 12.3%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $46,865, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $53,127, a difference of 2.3%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $103,682, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaNorwegian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Good
$44,480
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Excellent
$106,144
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Good
$86,084
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Good
$46,865
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Excellent
$55,965
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Poor
$38,802
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Exceptional
$53,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Good
$96,866
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Excellent
$103,682
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Average
$61,104
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
29.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaNorwegian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
3.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.3%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.5%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaNorwegian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.96%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaNorwegian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Exceptional
46.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
84.4%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.3%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.73%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.08, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaNorwegian
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.08
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
50.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
29.3%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 83.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaNorwegian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
62.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 38.9%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.1%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaNorwegian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
96.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
95.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
94.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
92.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.90%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaNorwegian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%