Mexican vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 523,605,865 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Mexican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.861. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexicans corresponds to a decrease of 16.8 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,559 compared to $44,480, a difference of 28.7%), median family income ($85,618 compared to $106,144, a difference of 24.0%), and median male earnings ($46,147 compared to $55,965, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,989 compared to $53,127, a difference of 6.3%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,897 compared to $61,104, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 93.2%), family poverty (11.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 71.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and single male poverty (14.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 45.1%), and unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 29.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 45.7%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 25.9%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.54%), married-couple households (47.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households (69.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.8%), no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.70%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 144.5%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.0%), and professional degree (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.2%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.77%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.8%).