Canadian vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,772,761 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.206% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 206.0 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $44,480, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $38,802, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,597 compared to $106,144, a difference of 0.43%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $96,866, a difference of 0.78%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $103,682, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.3%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.7%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 8.8%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.87%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.08, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.2%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (47.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.20%), disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.9%).