Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,956,698 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.326. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 8.3 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 49.9%), per capita income ($38,766 compared to $57,384, a difference of 48.0%), and median male earnings ($48,040 compared to $68,716, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $55,913, a difference of 9.6%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $46,902, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,027 compared to $69,857, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 68.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 6.6%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.1%), male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 66.2%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 54.3%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 10.7%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 123.0%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 120.2%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 73.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 36.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.4%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.1%).