Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,585,574 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 14.4 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $57,384, a difference of 27.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $117,219, a difference of 20.6%), and median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $68,716, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $55,913, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $69,857, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.31%), male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and poverty (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.80%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.92%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 80.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 65.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.8%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 8th grade (95.9% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.67%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.5%).