Hungarian vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,685,364 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.638. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 55.1 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,426 compared to $57,384, a difference of 26.3%), median family income ($105,609 compared to $127,430, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,544 compared to $117,219, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $55,913, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $69,857, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 20.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.92%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 30.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 24.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.87%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 57.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 69.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 60.3%), and master's degree (15.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.31%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 61.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 32.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.2%).