Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,507,920 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.722. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 48.0 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $57,384, a difference of 31.0%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $68,716, a difference of 24.1%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $127,430, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.16%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $55,913, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $69,857, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 37.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.3%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 27.4%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 98.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 48.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 86.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 70.1%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 57.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 36.9%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.8%).