Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,320,145 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 11.5 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,257 compared to $117,219, a difference of 8.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,680 compared to $122,893, a difference of 8.1%), and median male earnings ($63,715 compared to $68,716, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $55,913, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $69,857, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.1%), single female poverty (19.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and receiving food stamps (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.2%), family households (61.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (46.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.5%), master's degree (20.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and bachelor's degree (46.4% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (90.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 23.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.18%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.9%).