Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,879,968 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.489. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.591% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 591.0 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $57,384, a difference of 12.7%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $68,716, a difference of 11.9%), and median household income ($93,602 compared to $104,090, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $55,913, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $69,857, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.10%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.8%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 28.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 29.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.6%).