Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,607,257 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 60.0 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $44,735, a difference of 20.6%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $78,249, a difference of 11.4%), and median household income ($75,123 compared to $68,461, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.44%), householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $50,374, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $76,701, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 42.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 32.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 25.1%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (42.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.4%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple households (42.8% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (50.7% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.42%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%).