Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,727,226 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.096% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to a decrease of 95.5 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,929 compared to $34,910, a difference of 34.4%), median male earnings ($57,941 compared to $43,461, a difference of 33.3%), and median family income ($103,197 compared to $78,249, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,846 compared to $50,374, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,523 compared to $80,662, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 45.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 2.8%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 60.8%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 46.7%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.74%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 206.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 56.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 24.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 45.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 68.4%), master's degree (17.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 64.5%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.6%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.66%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%).