Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Cuba
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Cuba
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,731,177 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.556% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 555.6 Immigrants from Cuba.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Cuba Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $44,735, a difference of 42.3%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $78,249, a difference of 39.1%), and per capita income ($47,394 compared to $34,910, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $50,374, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $33,291, a difference of 24.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Cuba |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,394 | Tragic $34,910 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,830 | Tragic $78,249 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,496 | Tragic $68,461 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,913 | Tragic $38,426 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,352 | Tragic $43,461 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,527 | Tragic $33,291 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,914 | Tragic $50,374 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,880 | Tragic $76,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,992 | Tragic $80,662 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,643 | Tragic $44,735 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 109.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 74.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 6.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Cuba |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 19.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 18.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Fair 21.2% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Average 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 30.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 7.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 17.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 19.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 20.8% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Cuba |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 25.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Cuba |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Tragic 72.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 36.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 28.0%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Cuba |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 68.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Tragic 44.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Tragic 43.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 41.5% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.53%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Cuba |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 91.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 85.7%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 60.7%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Cuba |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 93.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 93.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Tragic 88.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 87.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Tragic 83.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 80.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.9% | Tragic 55.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.3% | Tragic 50.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Tragic 39.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.6% | Tragic 30.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Tragic 10.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.2% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Cuba |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Fair 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Fair 47.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Good 3.0% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |