Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,622,953 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.753% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 752.8 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $44,735, a difference of 40.9%), median family income ($107,715 compared to $78,249, a difference of 37.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $80,662, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $50,374, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $33,291, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 94.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 75.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 43.2%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 31.2%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.55%), family households (65.0% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.070%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 72.9%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 48.6%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.93%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.8%).