Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,033,286 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.333. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.085% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 85.1 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,027 compared to $44,735, a difference of 20.8%), wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $33,291, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $50,374, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,035 compared to $80,662, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,298 compared to $76,701, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 29.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.33%), poverty (14.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 51.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 49.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.7% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 63.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.3%).