Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,718,286 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.879% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 1,879.3 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $50,374, a difference of 16.4%), householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $44,735, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $76,701, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($44,204 compared to $43,461, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($39,169 compared to $38,426, a difference of 1.9%), and per capita income ($35,720 compared to $34,910, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 59.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 53.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.1%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty (17.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.5%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 37.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in family households (59.2% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 15.1%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.5%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.2%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.6%).