Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,939,109 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.511. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.267% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to a decrease of 266.9 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $44,735, a difference of 23.7%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $33,291, a difference of 23.0%), and median family income ($94,466 compared to $78,249, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $50,374, a difference of 4.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $80,662, a difference of 13.3%), and wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 30.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.0%), male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 51.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 49.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 24.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 172.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 37.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 19.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 35.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.9%), and bachelor's degree (35.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.030%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.47%).