Choctaw vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,377,966 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 8.0 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $86,498, a difference of 23.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $101,580, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $65,427, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $51,389, a difference of 7.7%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $44,206, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 50.1%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 45.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.6%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.8%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.2%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (64.9% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.20%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.8%), associate's degree (37.8% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.2%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.5%).