Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uzbekistan

Samoans

Fair
Fair
4,141
SOCIAL INDEX
38.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
204th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Samoan Integration in Immigrants from Uzbekistan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,660,139 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.296. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to a decrease of 43.7 Samoans.
Immigrants from Uzbekistan Integration in Samoan Communities

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,929 compared to $39,826, a difference of 17.8%), householder income over 65 years ($56,331 compared to $65,427, a difference of 16.2%), and median female earnings ($43,363 compared to $37,498, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,425 compared to $86,498, a difference of 0.080%), householder income under 25 years ($54,846 compared to $54,610, a difference of 0.43%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,523 compared to $101,580, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanSamoan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,929
Tragic
$39,826
Median Family Income
Average
$103,197
Fair
$100,344
Median Household Income
Good
$86,425
Good
$86,498
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,151
Tragic
$44,206
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,941
Tragic
$51,389
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,363
Tragic
$37,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,846
Exceptional
$54,610
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,849
Fair
$92,385
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,523
Good
$101,580
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,331
Exceptional
$65,427
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.7%
Fair
26.0%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 48.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 40.2%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.12%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanSamoan
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Good
12.0%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Good
8.6%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Good
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
12.9%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.3%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.1%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Fair
12.1%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.71%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanSamoan
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.4%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Average
5.4%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 34.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.72%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanSamoan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Exceptional
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.6%), births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.42, a difference of 5.6%), and family households (63.4% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 7.2%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanSamoan
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
67.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.4%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.42
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Average
46.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.8%
Fair
32.6%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 249.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 154.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 108.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 26.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 62.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 108.3%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanSamoan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
73.4%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
25.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 55.7%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.7%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.34%), 4th grade (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanSamoan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Fair
90.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
63.0%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.3%
Tragic
41.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.8%
Tragic
31.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.9%
Tragic
11.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.7%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.68%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Samoan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanSamoan
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Tragic
49.5%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%