Pima vs Samoan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Samoan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Samoans
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Samoan Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,827,331 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.920. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 25.5 Samoans.
Pima vs Samoan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $101,580, a difference of 38.5%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $86,498, a difference of 36.7%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $39,826, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,610, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,498, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $92,385, a difference of 11.6%).
Income Metric | Pima | Samoan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $39,826 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Fair $100,344 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Good $86,498 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $44,206 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $51,389 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $37,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $54,610 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Fair $92,385 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Good $101,580 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $65,427 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Fair 26.0% |
Pima vs Samoan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 133.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 114.7%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 113.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 7.0%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 35.6%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 47.0%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Samoan |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Good 12.0% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Good 8.6% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Good 15.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 12.1% |
Pima vs Samoan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 134.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 125.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 115.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Samoan |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Average 5.4% |
Pima vs Samoan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 12.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Samoan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 81.8% |
Pima vs Samoan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 57.8%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 3.0%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 8.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Samoan |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 67.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.42 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Fair 32.6% |
Pima vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 85.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 7.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Samoan |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 7.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 25.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Pima vs Samoan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 37.1%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 36.1%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.24%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Samoan |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Fair 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 63.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 41.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 31.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 11.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Pima vs Samoan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 51.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.1%), male disability (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.0%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Samoan |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 49.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Poor 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |