Canadian vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,526,187 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 71.3 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $39,826, a difference of 15.1%), median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $51,389, a difference of 11.5%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($87,769 compared to $86,498, a difference of 1.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $101,580, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $54,610, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.7%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.73%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.1%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.42, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.96%), births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 40.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 40.1%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.15%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.6%).