Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Latvia

Samoans

Excellent
Fair
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Samoan Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,245,263 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.221% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 221.1 Samoans.
Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Samoan Communities

Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $39,826, a difference of 27.8%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $51,389, a difference of 19.5%), and median earnings ($51,555 compared to $44,206, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $65,427, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $54,610, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LatviaSamoan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,914
Tragic
$39,826
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,826
Fair
$100,344
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,602
Good
$86,498
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,555
Tragic
$44,206
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,422
Tragic
$51,389
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,099
Tragic
$37,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,737
Exceptional
$54,610
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,522
Fair
$92,385
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,454
Good
$101,580
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,298
Exceptional
$65,427
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Fair
26.0%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.7%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.9%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LatviaSamoan
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Good
12.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Good
8.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Good
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
13.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Fair
12.1%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LatviaSamoan
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Average
5.4%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LatviaSamoan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.8%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.9%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.7%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.3%), and family households with children (25.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.11%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.8%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LatviaSamoan
Family Households
Tragic
62.0%
Exceptional
67.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.42
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Average
46.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.1%
Fair
32.6%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 68.0%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 58.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 43.6%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LatviaSamoan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.2%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
25.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 75.6%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 67.6%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.46%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LatviaSamoan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Fair
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.1%
Tragic
63.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.8%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.8%
Tragic
41.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
31.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
11.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Samoan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LatviaSamoan
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
49.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%