Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Samoans

Good
Fair
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Samoan Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,940,906 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.523. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.067% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 66.9 Samoans.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Samoan Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $39,826, a difference of 10.0%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $65,427, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $101,580, a difference of 0.19%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $86,498, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $92,385, a difference of 2.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianSamoan
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$39,826
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Fair
$100,344
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Good
$86,498
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Tragic
$44,206
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Tragic
$51,389
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Tragic
$37,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Exceptional
$54,610
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Fair
$92,385
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Good
$101,580
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Exceptional
$65,427
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Fair
26.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.7%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianSamoan
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Good
12.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Good
8.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Good
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
13.8%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Fair
12.1%

Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.3%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianSamoan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianSamoan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Exceptional
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
81.8%

Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.0%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.42, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.23%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianSamoan
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
67.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.42
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Average
46.8%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Fair
32.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.12%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianSamoan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
25.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
9.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.5%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 26.5%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.71%).
Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianSamoan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Fair
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
63.0%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
41.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
31.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
11.5%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.61%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianSamoan
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
49.5%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%