Choctaw vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,011,741 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $39,568, a difference of 9.9%), median family income ($84,835 compared to $91,926, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $84,461, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $45,764, a difference of 0.69%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $55,677, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 19.6%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 0.81%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 15.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.33%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.9%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.8%).