Danish vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,807,577 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Danish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Danes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Danes corresponds to an increase of 19.6 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Danish and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,619 compared to $88,390, a difference of 19.5%), median household income ($87,676 compared to $75,240, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,041 compared to $45,764, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,730 compared to $36,034, a difference of 4.7%), median earnings ($46,392 compared to $42,651, a difference of 8.8%), and per capita income ($44,095 compared to $39,568, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Danish and Osage communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 35.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.5%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.3%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Danish and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Danish and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Danish and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.0%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.12%), family households (66.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Danish and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.3% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Danish and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.9%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Danish and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.6%).