European vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,655,486 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Europeans corresponds to an increase of 65.7 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between European and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,367 compared to $88,390, a difference of 20.3%), median household income ($88,751 compared to $75,240, a difference of 18.0%), and median family income ($108,099 compared to $91,926, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($39,457 compared to $36,034, a difference of 9.5%), and median earnings ($47,915 compared to $42,651, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between European and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 26.9%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between European and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between European and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between European and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.3%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.93%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between European and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.59%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between European and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.4%), master's degree (15.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between European and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 23.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.9%).