Czechoslovakian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,178,426 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.552. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.374% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 373.9 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $88,390, a difference of 14.7%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $75,240, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $84,461, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $36,034, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $55,677, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.2%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.4%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.6%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 0.090%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.5%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.0%).