Lebanese vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,871,263 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Lebanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.829. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lebanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.109% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lebanese corresponds to an increase of 109.1 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,734 compared to $88,390, a difference of 18.5%), median household income ($88,091 compared to $75,240, a difference of 17.1%), and median family income ($107,086 compared to $91,926, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,355 compared to $45,764, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($40,006 compared to $36,034, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.98%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.34%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.51%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.9%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 31.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 28.7%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.5%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.4%).