Romanian vs Osage Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Osage

Excellent
Fair
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Osage Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,011,118 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.955. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.209% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 209.0 Osage.
Romanian Integration in Osage Communities

Romanian vs Osage Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $88,390, a difference of 22.9%), per capita income ($48,445 compared to $39,568, a difference of 22.4%), and median household income ($91,994 compared to $75,240, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $55,677, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $36,034, a difference of 15.6%).
Romanian vs Osage Income
Income MetricRomanianOsage
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Tragic
$39,568
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Tragic
$91,926
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Tragic
$75,240
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Tragic
$42,651
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Tragic
$50,292
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Tragic
$36,034
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Tragic
$45,764
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Tragic
$84,461
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Tragic
$88,390
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Tragic
$55,677
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
27.1%

Romanian vs Osage Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 31.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 28.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.3%).
Romanian vs Osage Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianOsage
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
17.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
16.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
32.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Excellent
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Average
11.7%

Romanian vs Osage Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Romanian vs Osage Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianOsage
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Average
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Romanian vs Osage Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Romanian vs Osage Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianOsage
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
63.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
80.6%

Romanian vs Osage Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.6%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and family households (64.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Romanian vs Osage Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianOsage
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Average
6.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Excellent
47.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Fair
32.1%

Romanian vs Osage Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.7%).
Romanian vs Osage Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianOsage
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
58.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.8%

Romanian vs Osage Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.8%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 36.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Romanian vs Osage Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianOsage
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Good
92.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
84.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
62.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
55.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
33.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.7%

Romanian vs Osage Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.7%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.8%).
Romanian vs Osage Disability
Disability MetricRomanianOsage
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%